The New Consipracy Theory
I might as well confess that this one is something that I have dreamt up all on my own. The way it started was that I was trying to understand whats happening in Afghanistan and our wild west, with the militants and talibans and whatnot. The following is what makes sense to me.
I am assuming that there is a group of people out there who think that the failure of the Soviet Afghan adventure and their subsequent collapse as a super power is a model that may be followed as true. The US is entrenched in both Afghanistan and Iraq for many reasons but the main one would be to control areas that have oil or may be required to get access to oil. So these people think that by getting America and her allies embroiled in this type of guerrilla war, sooner or later, US will be defeated and this will lead to their eventual collapse. This group then becomes responsible for aiding the militants/talibans/terrorists by giving them cash and or arms ammunitions, and using our wild west as the launching grounds for these offensives. The only difference is that this time around, the government of Pakistan is not endorsing these activities for obvious reasons. That is not to say that the government is involved, just that even if they were involved, they couldn't admit it.
The next question is, who are these people? The usual suspects would be the Saudis, Iranians (mutually exclusive, or so I think) or dare I say it, could it be the Russians?
FDR met with the Saudi King in 1945 aboard a US naval ship. Since then the royal family of KSA has waltzed with the yankees doing everything the holy father in Washington has asked for. But there has been an underlying dissent by people like our friend Ossama. So this group could be made up of people like that, with the money and the motive.
Based on the oldest rivalry in the region between the Arabs and the Persian Empire, the Iranians are next. And they have been against the yanks since forever. I feel it also has to do with the fact that the Saudis decided to side with the US. The US has tried everything, first putting the Shah on the throne, something that didn't last very long. The war with Iraq, with the US on Saddam's side. They have the oil (thus the money) and the motive.
My money would be on the Soviets. I wouldn't put it past my friend Putin to dream up a diabolical plot to bring down the US hegemony. In this fast changing world, where yesterday's friends are today's enemies, a Russian-Taliban alliance would not surprise me at all. Probably fronted by someone else, that would be my guess.
So there you have it, one or more of these groups working together for the state of unrest in the region, whether they will be successful or not, only time will tell!
I am assuming that there is a group of people out there who think that the failure of the Soviet Afghan adventure and their subsequent collapse as a super power is a model that may be followed as true. The US is entrenched in both Afghanistan and Iraq for many reasons but the main one would be to control areas that have oil or may be required to get access to oil. So these people think that by getting America and her allies embroiled in this type of guerrilla war, sooner or later, US will be defeated and this will lead to their eventual collapse. This group then becomes responsible for aiding the militants/talibans/terrorists by giving them cash and or arms ammunitions, and using our wild west as the launching grounds for these offensives. The only difference is that this time around, the government of Pakistan is not endorsing these activities for obvious reasons. That is not to say that the government is involved, just that even if they were involved, they couldn't admit it.
The next question is, who are these people? The usual suspects would be the Saudis, Iranians (mutually exclusive, or so I think) or dare I say it, could it be the Russians?
FDR met with the Saudi King in 1945 aboard a US naval ship. Since then the royal family of KSA has waltzed with the yankees doing everything the holy father in Washington has asked for. But there has been an underlying dissent by people like our friend Ossama. So this group could be made up of people like that, with the money and the motive.
Based on the oldest rivalry in the region between the Arabs and the Persian Empire, the Iranians are next. And they have been against the yanks since forever. I feel it also has to do with the fact that the Saudis decided to side with the US. The US has tried everything, first putting the Shah on the throne, something that didn't last very long. The war with Iraq, with the US on Saddam's side. They have the oil (thus the money) and the motive.
My money would be on the Soviets. I wouldn't put it past my friend Putin to dream up a diabolical plot to bring down the US hegemony. In this fast changing world, where yesterday's friends are today's enemies, a Russian-Taliban alliance would not surprise me at all. Probably fronted by someone else, that would be my guess.
So there you have it, one or more of these groups working together for the state of unrest in the region, whether they will be successful or not, only time will tell!